Stanford Social Innovation Review

Stanford Social Innovation Review is an award-winning magazine covering best strategies for nonprofits, foundations, and socially responsible businesses. Published quarterly by the Stanford Graduate School of Business.

Subscriber Login



Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?
Obtain a login

RSS Feed

Related Opinions

Browse by Categories

Social Media: Means vs Ends

Other articles on: • 
Posted: October 7, 2008 11:15 AM
Author: Amy Sample Ward

Let’s take a short foray into some theorizing with social media and community—won’t you join me?

Let’s assume social media is the means to an end. That ‘end’ is going to be different depending on whether you are using it as an organization or an individual, for conversations or for advertising, for profit or for community, for fun or for policies. So, when social media meets up, in person or online, and communities form, is it mostly around the means (specific tools, advocating for adoption, etc.) or the end (people using social media in general for the same purpose or cause)?

So, asked again: Do we come together around social media because of affinity toward specific platforms, tools, or programs or because of similarities in usage of those platforms, tools, or programs?

Personally, I’m more attracted to communities or events that discuss using various tools for a specific ends. Working in the nonprofit technology field, I gravitate toward conversations about how nonprofits can better engage their members online or share resources between staff and volunteers, rather than conversations solely about Flickr, for example. That isn’t to say that Flickr isn’t included, but it is just an example, an option, a means, for engaging the community around an event or program. Is the preference based on my field?

I can think of many communities that would focus on just one tool, though, and (to answer my question from above) are focusing on the tool because of the field. For example, urban photographers could very easily come together specifically to discuss their use of Flickr, the community on Flickr, site developments, changes in the way they use the tool, and more. Why? Because as one of the most popular photo sharing websites, it is probably used by all of the photographers in the group and by their colleagues or friends. It makes sense that they would come together about the tool specifically, even though it is a means to their end of sharing photos online.

Does it then, really matter if social media communities and conversations are focused on either the means or the ends?  It isn’t as if we are discussing war, right? The uses, developments, and constant permutations of social media are so diverse and evolving so quickly—is it enough to help each other just keep pace?

What do you think? Do you find that you are more drawn to conversations, collaborations, or communities that focus on a specific tool or tool set or that focus on the uses and applications of social media generally?


imageAmy Sample Ward’s passion for nonprofit technology has lead her to involvement with NTEN, NetSquared, and a host of other organizations. She shares many of her thoughts on nonprofit technology news and evolutions on her blog.

Chat Bubble Comment

Amy, you might be interested in a community media pilot I did in the slums of India called Lok Darshan.  The idea was to use digital media to create a community-driven, community-serving bottom-of-the-pyramid edu-tainment and marketing platform for appropriate technology.  The model had its successes and lessons, some of which are on my blog posting about the project.

If you haven’t guessed my opinion already, I’m heavily biased towards how tools and technologies are applied rather than tools themselves.

»» Posted by: rahul on October 10, 2008 08:42 AM

Chat Bubble Comment

Hi Amy-

Really, I see communities/conversations that go both ways - conversations around the tools themselves and around the ends those tools achieve. And yes- I think it matters very much that we have both!

If you just have folks discussing the ends, the results, you miss a lot of valuable conversation about making sure that the means even get you to an end result, or get you to the right end result, or get you there the right way! Conversely, if you have folks only discussing the tools, then you miss equally valuable conversation that is (in many, if not most cases) the purpose of the tools!

While sometimes the pendulum swings too far one way or another (the echo chamber gets too loud, or maybe we fail to notice how a tool is directing our conversation), it still takes both conversations (tools and their applications) to achieve a balance.

That’s my 2cents (or shall I say pence?) smile

- Erin

»» Posted by: Erin McMahon on October 13, 2008 05:44 PM

Chat Bubble Post a Comment

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Please enter the word you see in the image below: