Stanford Social Innovation Review

Stanford Social Innovation Review is an award-winning magazine covering best strategies for nonprofits, foundations, and socially responsible businesses. Published quarterly by the Stanford Graduate School of Business.

Subscriber Login



Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your username or password?
Obtain a login

RSS Feed

Related Opinions

Browse by Categories

Archives








Nonprofit Sector Needs to Be Better Understood

Other articles on: •  •  •  •  •  •  • 
Posted: February 22, 2010 10:01 AM
Author: Todd Cohen

The nonprofit sector does not get enough respect.

The sector is big and sprawling, plays an indispensable role in society and the economy, and faces daunting financial and operating challenges.

Yet the sector generally is poorly understood and underappreciated.

A report prepared for Congress last fall by the Congressional Research Service gives a good snapshot of the sector’s magnitude and impact.

Released in November, “An Overview of the Nonprofit and Charitable Sector” features lots of data and information about the size and scope of the sector and how it is funded, and about its relationship with government and key policy issues it faces.

“The nonprofit and charitable sector represents a significant, highly diverse component of the U.S. economy,” the report says.

Noting that President Barack Obama has “turned toward the nonprofit sector while seeking solutions to social problems,” the report says the economic downturn “increased the demand for many of the goods and services provided by charitable organizations, while simultaneously placing the same organizations under increased financial constraints.”

In providing an overview of the charitable sector’s relationship with government, the report says that, in theory, “economics suggests that the government should subsidize activities that are either public goods or have positive external effects.”

And it says it “can be argued that some charitable activities possess these qualities.”

The report also examines the costs to government of providing grants; allowing charitable contributions to be deductible; exempting investment income of charities from tax; and providing property and sales tax exemptions.

It also looks at government’s oversight role.

And it reviews key policy options affecting the sector, including increasing government grants and subsidies to charities; creating an oversight agency within the federal government to gather data, conduct research, and advocate for the charitable sector; implementing policies to help charities and foundations in economic downturns; and changing the itemized deduction for charitable contributions by limiting the deduction, converting it to a credit or making it more widely available.

Among data in the report:

  • Over 1.5 million nonprofits are registered in the U.S., nearly 64 percent of them public charities, nearly 8 percent private foundations, and 29 percent other types of nonprofits.
  • In 2005, the nonprofit sector overall employed 12.9 million people, or 10 percent of the workforce,
  • From 1998 to 2005, nonprofit employment overall grew 16.4 percent, compared to 6.2 percent for overall employment in the U.S.
  • In 2004, the charitable sector alone employed an estimated 9.4 million people, or over 7 percent of the U.S. workforce, plus the equivalent of 4.7 million full-time volunteer workers.
  • Based on employment, the charitable sector is larger than the construction sector and larger than the finance, insurance and real-estate sectors combined, and it has nearly half as many employees as federal, state and local government combined.
  • In 2009, public charities reported $1.4 trillion in total revenue and $2.6 trillion in assets, while private foundations reported $181 billion in revenue and $621 billion in assets, and other nonprofits reported $386 billion in revenue and over $1 trillion in assets.
  • In 2008, a broad category of nonprofits known as “nonprofit institutions serving households,” a subset of the overall nonprofit sector, generated 5.2 percent of U.S. gross domestic product, or GDP, representing $751.2 billion worth of output.
  • Nonprofits’ share of GDP grew 0.4 percentage points from 1998 to 2008, consisting of wages paid to nonprofit employees, the rental value of assets owned and used by nonprofits while providing services, and rental income from tenant-occupied housing nonprofits own.
  • Charities raised $1.2 trillion in revenue in 2005, with fees or private payments for service accounting for 49 percent of overall revenue and government grants and contracts accounting for 29 percent; private contributions, return on investments, and other sources accounted for the remainder.
  • Total revenue for charitable institutions grew 68.6 percent from 1995 to 2005.
  • During the recession, from 2007 to 2008, charitable giving fell 2 percent in nominal terms, and 5.7 percent adjusted for inflation.
    imageTodd Cohen, a veteran news reporter and editor, is editor and publisher of Philanthropy Journal, an online newspaper that is a program of the Institute for Nonprofits at North Carolina State University in Raleigh, N.C. Cohen has taught nonprofit reporting and media relations at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and at Duke University, and regularly speaks on the topics of nonprofit media relations and trends in the charitable world.
Chat Bubble Comment

The idealistic trillion-dollar US non-profit sector has the greatest potential to ‘fix the world.’  Through economic and social leverage in the 3rd World, US charities and aid organizations can do these all at the same time: raise the 3rd World poor, address climate change, enable charities to multiply their aid funds, and end the current recession.
  How?  The keys are agribusiness modeling and ‘mass entrepreneurship’ in the 3rd World.  It can all begin with blogging nets.  As individuals, groups or part of institutions, bloggers by the millions can chip in ‘loose change’ or ‘affordable’ capital to set up one model agribusiness project after another.  First project sites may be in the Philippines where technologies and skills for such endeavors already exist.  Blogging nets linking up with local skills can form the groups that will set up and run the model projects.  Hundred-hectare priorities may be as follows: Multi-crop multi-livestock farms with managed forest.  Heavily-reforested upland mini-dam hydropower chains.  Forest ranches with high-protein forage trees. Crab, fish and shrimp aquaculture with mangrove reforestation.  Ethanol distilleries with sweet sorghum plantations.  Wetland and waterways forest resorts with breeding facilities for threatened animal species.
  These projects can yield dividends for all investors at above-market rates.  Ethanol distilleries for instance yields profits at an incredible 80% of sales, based on Brazilian experience.  The ‘world-fixing’ effect however comes from the consequent social leverage.  Our projects’ high profit rates will encourage around thirty million Philippine employees to replicate the models.  Philippine employees earn just $200-$500 monthly (which means debts instead of capital build-up), so they will tend to pressure State into passing a law that dedicates say ten percent of yearly budget towards lending to thousand-employee groups that set up agribusiness joint ventures with 1st World companies.  Joint ventures triple local capital thru equipment loans so the law creates thousands of large companies and millions of jobs each year, for as long as humans exist.  Translation: all local poor eventually getting good jobs, corporate shares and dividends that enable them to become educated middle classes on permanent basis (currently, 66% of 90 million Filipinos are Elementary level ‘hungry poor’).
  All other job-starved tropical 3rd World countries should certainly copy our Philippine model.  3rd World governments ever short of funds will lobby for 1st World laws that dedicate say 5% of state budget and 5% of over $100 trillion in private funds (used mainly in ‘casino trades’) towards grant of long-term loans to the tropical agribusinesses.  The happy consequences: Perpetual laws eventually employing all tropical poor.  Fortunes in stock shares and dividends flowing among 3rd World masses, thus leveling the scandalous wealth and power imbalances that create unimaginable miseries in poor societies.  Planet-size markets for US/1st World production ending the recession.  Global warming tamed by new tropics-wide forests and farms. 
      One reason why the USA has led the world for centuries is the idealism of its citizenry.  It’s high time for US non-profits (who are welcomed everywhere) to lead at planet-scale.

»» Posted by: Nimref on February 26, 2010 07:16 PM

Chat Bubble Post a Comment

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Please enter the word you see in the image below: