Stanford Social Innovation Review

Stanford Social Innovation Review is an award-winning magazine covering best strategies for nonprofits, foundations, and socially responsible businesses. Published quarterly by the Stanford Graduate School of Business.

Subscriber Login



Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?
Obtain a login

RSS Feed

Related Opinions

Browse by Categories

Lobbying Done Right

Other articles on: • 
Posted: April 11, 2007 09:02 AM
Author: SSIR Editor

PETER MANZO on the tactics nonprofits need to make themselves heard.

“When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint.  When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a communist.” - Helder Camara, Archbishop of Olinda and Recife, Brazil (1909-1999)

When training nonprofit leaders how to lobby legally, I always begin with this quote to remind them that if they are going to get involved in policy debates, some board members and donors will think they should shut up; and they will attract opposition, perhaps even enemies.  But lately I’ve wondered whether I should warn them instead that the worst thing they might face is being ignored. 

Many advocates in the nonprofit world believe deeply in the power of facts and analysis.  Most trained community organizers would dismiss this as hopelessly naive. 

To start, as one of my colleagues has observed many times, most public officials, and even their staffs, don’t read. They don’t have time (and some don’t have the inclination).  Add to that the kind of resources business lobbies can invoke to make legislators’ jobs easier, plus the power of “night time” lobbying through campaign contributions, and it’s clear what an uphill battle it is for advocates for the poor. 

Another colleague recently recounted a conversation that she had had a few years prior with a good progressive state legislator.  He had described to her his experience with a bill sponsored by the health insurance industry, which came to him wrapped as a package – draft bill written, a list of committed and likely votes from other committees and other legislators lined up, media strategy ready to go. Virtually all he had to do was show up and claim credit. (Thankfully, in this instance, the bill’s purpose was a good one.) He contrasted that package with another bill that dominated his staff’s time for nearly a year. 

The challenge for advocates for the poor is to build the kind of tactical capabilities that the health insurance lobby showed in that example.  To be sure, advocates for the poor absolutely must have the ability to do strong data analysis and make forceful policy and legal arguments.  But this persuasive power needs to be combined with the kind of community mobilization that organizers can help bring. And ideally, it also needs to have the kind of logistical support that the business lobbies, with their armies of consultants, enjoy.  This last factor – the one that actually may enable a legislator to sponsor a change – is the one that is most difficult for advocates for the poor to pull off. 

Foundation grants fund lots of analysis, and a good deal of “public education,” but most funders shrink from funding those kinds of tactical expenses, which also bear the added stigma of looking like “overhead.” How might things be different if grantmakers seeking to support social change more frankly embraced what their grantees need to do to exercise power? What else might we do to help nonprofit advocates build these capabilities?



imagePeter Manzo is the director of strategic initiatives for the Advancement Project, a civil rights advocacy organization, and a senior research fellow with the Center for Civil Society in the UCLA School of Public Affairs. Previously, he was the executive director and general counsel of the Center for Nonprofit Management. 

Chat Bubble Comment

Non-profits that advocate for the poor are made of social workers, and community organizers that truly and deeply believe in their cause: to uplift or provide a safety net for those they feel committed to. Non-profit directors rise through the ranks, or by default to leadership positions. Are they versed in public policy? Or statistical data?  With luck the director or a co-worker would have mastered the art of writing grants and telling the organizations story to the funders in a compelling manner with some facts and data. This approache causes non-profit fatigue in that the organization lives from hand-to-mouth much the same way their clients do.
The key and it is no secret is to develop a public policy agenda, know the players e.g. funders, legislative players, and power brokers both inside and outside of government agencies. This requires the agency to develop such a philosophy and personnel, and it takes funds that would otherwise to to helping the clients the non-profit professes to help.
We at Morehead State University’s Institute for Regional Analysis and Public Policy believe that in training Social Workers, Sociologists, government majors in bridging two and three worlds: that of knowing how public policy works, how to gather and use data to tell the story of the non-profit, and most important how to advocate on behalf of their clients.

»» Posted by: William Salazar on April 13, 2007 06:04 AM

Chat Bubble Comment

I can’t agree with you more, Peter.  We need more resources spent on advocacy at the logistical/tactical support level as well.  We can get a lot more savvy about how to get our ideas across.  I love Seth Godin’s mantra:  “The idea that spreads, wins.  Period.” It doesn’t matter how many reports that are published, it’s the idea that matters.  And as advocates, we need to get more savvy about what are the best ways to spread and get people behind our ideas.

There is a great book on how to lobby with little money.  It gives very clear guidance on who in the federal government and which committees to lobby, how to activate coalitions, and how to use media.  The book is actually for librarians who’ve had to constantly advocate for more resources and better access to information, but I’ve found it really useful in my own case as a small nonprofit which does not have the benefit of a DC lobbyist.  It’s called Lobbying for Librarians.

»» Posted by: Perla Ni on April 20, 2007 03:55 PM

Chat Bubble Comment

Besides developing leaderships, and mission statements. It is a must that non-profits develop political savvy. More articles and “advocacy” in this area is warranted. I’d like for non-profit CEO’s, directors and boards to step-up to the plate and write more articles, as well as find a means to distribute their views.

»» Posted by: William Salazar on May 18, 2007 06:35 AM

Chat Bubble Post a Comment

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Please enter the word you see in the image below: