Stanford Social Innovation Review

Stanford Social Innovation Review is an award-winning magazine covering best strategies for nonprofits, foundations, and socially responsible businesses. Published quarterly by the Stanford Graduate School of Business.

Subscriber Login



Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?
Obtain a login

RSS Feed

Related Opinions

Browse by Categories

If we don’t give donors power, they can take it

Other articles on:
Posted: September 18, 2007 12:32 PM
Author: Jeff Brooks

It’s easy to talk about the subject of empowering donors as a theoretical option for forward-thinking nonprofits.

It’s not going to stay that way.  If you don’t give donors power, they’re going to seize it, leaving you all goggle-eyed and confused, like Marie Antoinette, wondering what happened.

At Network For Good, an online giving portal, 20 percent of donors choose to be anonymous when they give.  Their gift goes to the nonprofit of their choice, but their receipt is issued by Network for Good.  The organization they gave to can neither thank the donor, report back, nor ask again.  It’s not a very attractive situation for nonprofits.

Last year, anonymous donations through Network for Good were more than $7 million, with an average gift of about $100.

While some donors may choose anonymity for noble or spiritual reasons, a significant group like what nonprofits do (like it enough to shell out a sizeable gift), but they don’t like the nonprofit--they don’t want a relationship at all!

The old contract with donors was this:  You give to us, and we have the right to do whatever we want with you after that--send as much mail as we want, telemarket, rent their names to others .... Worse, many nonprofits fail to report back on the impact of their giving, fail to offer donors meaningful choices, and don’t treat donors with respect.

A lot of donors don’t buy in to this contract.  They want to do good deeds, but they don’t want the stuff that follows.  And now, with places like Network for Good at their disposal, they can opt out of the contract.

This is going to get bigger, not smaller.

Your only defense: earn the right to have relationships with donors.  Make it so being on your list is the coolest experience around, and they spread the word.

For more on this subject, read Your Secret Donor Hates You at Trent Stamp’s Take, a blog by Trent Stamp, president of Charity Navigator.



imageJeff Brooks is creative director at Merkle|Domain, a direct-response agency serving the nonprofit world.  He blogs at the Donor Power Blog.

Chat Bubble Comment

This is so right! After my husband gave a small gift to a children’s health charity, we started getting inundated with calls. When told a firm “no,” some of the telemarketers come back with the attitude that you are a terrible person for not giving a donation. Guilting your donors into giving is not a good longterm strategy!

»» Posted by: koobatz on September 20, 2007 01:32 PM

Chat Bubble Comment

Jeff:
What is cool?  We are new in the “membership"(donor) game and want to make sure we do it right the first time.
Susan

»» Posted by: Susan on September 20, 2007 01:50 PM

Chat Bubble Comment

Interesting!  Out of each donation that the Network receives, how much does Network for Good retain and how much goes to the intended beneficiary?

»» Posted by: Kim on September 20, 2007 02:24 PM

Chat Bubble Comment

Excellent ideas.  As well as respecting the donors by not pestering them, I wish the Receiving Societies would offer a detailed report as to what went where.  There are too many willing and potential donors who have been put off by fear that there gifts will go into the wrong pockets.

»» Posted by: A Key on November 26, 2007 06:01 PM

Chat Bubble Post a Comment

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Please enter the word you see in the image below: