Stanford Social Innovation Review

Stanford Social Innovation Review is an award-winning magazine covering best strategies for nonprofits, foundations, and socially responsible businesses. Published quarterly by the Stanford Graduate School of Business.

Subscriber Login



Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?
Obtain a login

RSS Feed

Related Opinions

Browse by Categories

Hungry Heart Association

Other articles on: • 

• 

Posted: March 23, 2004 11:11 PM
Author: Perla Ni

The Spring 2004 issue of SSIR contains a case study of the growth and transformation of the American Heart Association’s Western States Affiliate.  The case study raises a fundamental question of, when does change of organizational strategy, especially as related to aggressive fund-raising, become “mission creep”?  In this case the organization’s income more than doubled in a six year period, resulting in a dramatic increase in support for heart research but reducing its involvment in public education and screening activities.  It seems clear that the mission evolved, but does it matter?

Chat Bubble Comment

Assuming that the Board made the choice, it doesn’t matter. In the words of John Carver, Boards determine, what good, for what people and at what cost.

»» Posted by: Jim Schultz on April 21, 2004 03:21 PM

Chat Bubble Comment

Mission statements are part of the “silos” in movement that are killing the sectors ability to optimize.  We are focused on internal organizational management for all the wrong reasons and in all the wrong ways.

»» Posted by: Marty on June 9, 2004 08:04 PM

Chat Bubble Comment

Missions are the driving force behind a nonprofit organization. It states the reason for existence and its purpose in civil society. Missions can always be revised in order to optimize an organization. For example, look at the March of Dimes that actually achieved their mission to beat Polio. Now, they exist under a different mission statement dedicated to improving infant health. I’m not sure what the definition of optimize insinuates in the previous comment but missions can and should always be revised if there starts to be mission-drift or other opportunities for different programs arise, etc. The sector’s ability to optimize can revolve around a revised mission statement but I still think the mission should exist in every nonprofit as a guideline for its existence. If not, how is the structuring different than a for-profit business that revolves around revenues? The Board of Directors should be constantly reviewing the mission and upholding the values in order to ensure proper governance. If nonprofits did not follow a mission-driven philosophy, which should be clearly communicated to board members, employees, donors, etc. then what is the framework for the nonprofit’s purpose? And how can you consistently communicate it to others?

»» Posted by: Kate Besanceney on July 27, 2005 11:36 PM

Chat Bubble Post a Comment

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Please enter the word you see in the image below: