Nonprofits
Too Many Nonprofits
An unresponsive political system has spurred the need for nonprofits.
People wonder why nonprofits are proliferating these days, and complain that the field is too crowded. But it finally occurred to the Nonprofiteer that the main reason for nonprofit multiplication isn’t Baby Boomer solipsism or a revival of civil society or easy access to technology; it’s something bigger, something so huge and obvious it’s nearly invisible: the exceptional unresponsiveness of our contemporary political system.
Don’t you feel helpless?
We choose a Democratic Senate and House to end the war, and they go on funding it and complaining they can’t get Republican permission to stop. (Just turn the money off! How complicated is this?)
We believe in our Constitutional right to privacy, but the Justice Department and the intelligence agencies felt free to violate it, and the self-same Democratic Congress is preparing to grant immunity to the phone companies that helped them do it. (Could this possibly be because the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee gets campaign contributions from the phone companies? Could it really be that a Rockefeller needs to sell us out for money?)
We believe we’re a civilized and law-abiding nation, but people are being tortured in our name. (Read that again: people are being tortured on your behalf. How’s it feel?) The Congress passes a law prohibiting torture; the President signs and then says he doesn’t have to abide by it. A judge tells the Executive Branch to safeguard evidence of torture relevant to future trials; instead, it tolerates destruction of a highly relevant videotape and then tells the judge not to investigate and the Congress not to hold hearings (because they might interfere with the judge’s investigation - no, I’m not making this up).
We believe we live in a representative democracy with three co-equal branches of government but apparently nothing—not Congressional subpoenas, not orders from Federal judges, not elections of an opposition majority - can stop this Administration from doing exactly what it pleases; and no one will even say that these refusals to obey the law constitute high crimes and misdemeanors, let alone pursue the Constitutional remedy of impeachment for them.
The Nonprofiteer - wealthy, independent, with access to a public platform - feels helpless. How much more helpless do her fellow citizens feel? Is it any wonder they choose self-help? And, with the public purse apparently permanently closed to them for such frivolous purposes as buying school supplies, is it any wonder they create nonprofits and ask for charity to support them?
So let’s assume there are too many nonprofits - too many to be efficient, or too many for private charity to support. That’s a symptom of a cause so much more important and frightening that it makes “proliferation of nonprofits” seem like a joke problem, up there with “shortage of cloth napkins.”
And, for a little irony with your despair, consider that funders complaining about nonprofit redundancy represent the very agglomerations of private wealth that have pushed citizens out of the political system and into the third sector to begin with. No wonder it sticks in some of our craws to be expected to herald the new philanthropists and laud them for their bold engagement in grappling with social problems - problems they created for the rest of us themselves.
Kelly Kleiman, who blogs as The Nonprofiteer, is a lawyer and freelance journalist whose reportage and essays about the arts, philanthropy and women’s issues have appeared in the Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, Christian Science Monitor and other dailies; in magazines including In These Times and Chicago Philanthropy; and on websites including Aislesay.com and Artscope.net.







Simply putting boxes and lines down on paper doesn’t guarantee that your organization will make better decisions.
Long-term investment in organic agriculture will provide above-market returns, environmental impact, and—in the developing world—enormous social impact.
Q&A with KoAnn Skrzyniarz of Sustainable Brands.
Critics of Obamacare have taken away attention from important aspects of the act such as its focus on keeping people healthy.
A riveting memoir by Egyptian revolutionary—and Google marketing executive—Wael Ghonim.




COMMENTS
BY JuanCarlosParedesTrujillo
ON December 27, 2007 02:33 PM
Hi Kelly. Great entry.
I agree. Ego and technology aside the root cause for the proliferation of non-profits is an unmet need.
Critics, however, are not complaining about people organizing themselves to take action They are complaining about the transaction burden this creates and the perceived inefficiencies of poorly funded and organized groups. Regarding the former: non-profits are asking the same people for the same thing in the same way by telling the same type of stories. This leads to saturation, which results in either apathy/numbness or making the easiest choice: donate to your alma mater, to your friend’s project, etc. Imagine a more capitalist government: the U.S. ambassador to Colombia, police, fireman, city cleaning, schools, ec could at any time call you to solicit funds or they would rely on you finding who they are and donating to the service they provide. In this light: the income, property, and even corporations donation of a percentage of profits are more efficient ways of reducing the transaction burden. Fundraising and project administration are separated. But we know how much of a hard sell taxes are today, plus even to the converts, how can they stomach the known corruption, partisanship, bureocracies and the political power of death merchants. In terms of corporations: should we drop our Macs and buy Berkshire Hathaway in hopes of centralizing money fo initiatives….
The problem of the inefficiencies of the little guy is smaller. In the past centuries big governemnt, big busineses managed the most visible change: they built roads, schools, hospitals. Technology is starting to change this. Our ability to collaborate towards a common goal has never been greater. As motivated people focused on specific goals achive great things. They will have more credibility.
“problems they created for the rest of us themselves.” I think we, specially in America now, need to take responsibility: How are we going to solve “the problems we created for ourselves.” Why are we living in a society that does not represent who we are? What am I going to do today about it, what’s the smartest thing I can do: educate, raise awareness, remove physical and mental barriers, create an infrasture for innovation research. How am I breaking down the problem, what am I trying to solve. Can I do it alone, do I need help, etc….