Six Theory of Change Pitfalls to Avoid
Simply putting boxes and lines down on paper doesn’t guarantee that your organization will make better decisions.
Simply putting boxes and lines down on paper doesn’t guarantee that your organization will make better decisions.
Lessons from the Community Catalyst Fund in Charlotte, North Carolina.
A new brand of social entrepreneurship is emerging.
Seven obstacles to making good decisions about impact evaluations and how to avoid them.
→ This form is for US/Canada subscribers. Are you an international subscriber?
Click here instead.
Subscribers get premium online access (articles with a key) including 9-year archive, downloadable digital edition, quarterly print issues (optional).
For “scaling what works” to actually work, we need a new and improved version that addresses two fundamental constraints.
We must use our scarce resources to serve disenfranchised people’s needs and demand that evidence of results play a greater role in funding decisions.
The biggest social wins will come from a shift in mind-set that refocuses efforts on improving organizational effectiveness.
The Catalyst Fund’s Manager, Peter Kramer, explains the fund’s goal and application process for nonprofit collaborations.
In order to succeed, philanthropies, like baseball teams, must rely on both objective and subjective analysis.