How funders can best support place-based initiatives.
A case for using targeted measures of progress in philanthropy.
The case for investing in the long-term health and well-being of communities, based on what those communities value.
These groups' perspectives are closer than most think—and it’s good news for philanthropy.
Are traditional assumptions about how we “do” philanthropy preventing us from finding new and better ways of working?
→ This form is for US/Canada subscribers. Are you an international subscriber?
Click here instead.
Subscribers get premium online access (articles with a key) including 9-year archive, downloadable digital edition, quarterly print issues (optional).
Three ways to create an environment where interdependent stakeholders can perform their individual roles optimally and collaborate with each other effectively.
The nonprofit funding process lacks transparency and fosters insecurity—and only funders can fix it.
No-strings-attached prizes incentivize innovation, but private foundations need to structure them carefully to avoid prohibitive penalty taxes.
By embracing a more-inclusive outreach approach, effective philanthropy advocates can attract more funders.
Participation in a network allows foundations to leverage their individual investment by surfacing multiple, ongoing opportunities for collaborative grantmaking.