Social Sector Peer Evaluation: A Proposal
Imagine a new nonprofit board governance practice where organizations engaged peers to assess their work.
Imagine a new nonprofit board governance practice where organizations engaged peers to assess their work.
Predict the results of two recent development studies, conducted by IPA, one of the world's leading poverty research organizations.
The recent collapse of Hull House is a reminder that the tectonic shifts underway in the human service sector cannot be avoided.
Refresh your dashboard to better inform your board's decisions.
Face-to-face conversations among CEOs reminds and reassures them that that failure is, in fact, the norm and does not preclude success.
→ This form is for US/Canada subscribers. Are you an international subscriber?
Click here instead.
Subscribers get premium online access (articles with a key) including 9-year archive, downloadable digital edition, quarterly print issues (optional).
Why do board cultures vary so much by geography, and how can we help bring the best of them to all cities?
What needs to be under public scrutiny is the entire range of unfettered discretion in spending that some nonprofit executives—and their boards—exercise.
If new executives develop themselves in alignment with the organization’s goals, they will mitigate stress and increase the likelihood of their success.
What nonprofits need isn’t more advice, it’s more money.